Crypto Firms Propose New Compromises to Keep Stable‑coin Yield Bill Alive
Washington, D.C. – As the U.S. Senate’s market‑structure legislation stalls, several crypto‑industry players are putting forward concessions aimed at assuaging banking concerns and moving the bill forward. The proposals, which center on expanding the role of community banks within the stable‑coin ecosystem, come amid heated debate over whether stable‑coin issuers should be permitted to offer interest‑bearing products that could compete with traditional savings accounts.
Background
The market‑structure bill, which passed the House of Representatives in late 2023, has encountered a deadlock in the Senate. Lawmakers are divided over the “yield” provision that would allow stable‑coin platforms to reward users with interest‑like returns. Banking groups argue that such rewards could divert deposits from conventional banks, while crypto advocates contend that the ability to earn yields is essential for the sector’s growth and consumer appeal.
A recent White House meeting that brought together representatives from the crypto industry and the banking community ended without a formal agreement, underscoring the difficulty of reconciling the two sides.
The New Proposals
Anonymous sources quoted by Bloomberg indicate that several crypto firms are now offering a set of compromises intended to soothe legislative concerns:
| Proposal | Intended Effect |
|---|---|
| Community‑bank involvement – Assign a larger operational role to local banks in the stable‑coin infrastructure. | Increases oversight and creates a direct partnership between crypto issuers and the traditional banking system. |
| Reserve‑holding requirement – Mandate that stable‑coin issuers keep a portion of their reserves in accounts held by community banks. | Provides tangible backing for stable‑coins, aligning them more closely with existing deposit‑insurance frameworks. |
| Co‑branding of stable‑coins – Facilitate joint issuance programs where community banks can launch their own stable‑coins in collaboration with crypto firms. | Gives banks a foothold in the digital‑asset market while offering crypto providers the legitimacy of a banking partner. |
These suggestions aim to transform stable‑coins from a largely decoupled fintech product into a hybrid model that leverages the regulatory and consumer‑trust assets of community banks.
Political Reactions
Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R‑SC) has signaled a willingness to entertain the concept of crypto‑generated rewards, provided they are not marketed as bank‑like deposit products. In a recent interview with Fox News, Scott emphasized that “allowing crypto firms to pay rewards is a good thing, but they cannot advertise as if they were a bank.”
He also reassured that a “deposit flight” – the feared mass withdrawal of funds from traditional banks to crypto platforms – is unlikely. Scott indicated that further discussions with consumer banks are planned for the coming week.
The Senate Agriculture Committee, which released a Republican draft of the bill in January, still faces opposition from Democratic senators. A full Senate vote will require at least seven Democratic votes to overcome the current partisan split.
Analysis
-
Bridging the Institutional Gap – By tying stable‑coin reserves to community banks, the proposals could satisfy regulators’ demand for transparency and solvency while giving crypto firms a credible bridge to the banking sector.
-
Potential Competitive Pressure – Banks may still view yield‑bearing stable‑coins as a competitive threat, especially if the combined crypto‑bank products can offer higher rates than FDIC‑insured accounts. However, the partnership model could mitigate this by allowing banks to capture a share of the new market.
-
Legislative Viability – The concessions align with the Senate Banking Committee’s stricter version of the bill, suggesting they could be incorporated into a bipartisan compromise. Still, the lack of a unified stance among Democrats remains a significant hurdle.
- Market Impact – If the bill passes with these amendments, the crypto industry could see a surge in stable‑coin adoption, particularly from retail users drawn by yield incentives. Conversely, the requirement to hold reserves at community banks may limit the speed of capital deployment for some issuers.
Key Takeaways
- Crypto firms are actively proposing compromises that give community banks a larger stake in the stable‑coin ecosystem, aiming to defuse Senate concerns.
- Senator Tim Scott supports reward‑based stable‑coins but draws a clear line against presenting them as traditional bank deposits.
- Legislative approval still hinges on bipartisan support, with at least seven Democratic votes needed to clear the Senate.
- If adopted, the amendments could create a hybrid stable‑coin model, combining crypto flexibility with banking oversight, potentially shaping the future of U.S. digital‑asset regulation.
The coming weeks will be critical as both sides return to the negotiating table. A resolution could not only determine the fate of the market‑structure bill but also set a precedent for how crypto and traditional finance can collaborate on a regulatory front.
Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/crypto-industry-proposes-compromises-advance-market-structure-bill?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound
