back to top

Bithumb Executes Erroneous $30 Billion Bitcoin Airdrop Due to Technical Mistake.

Bithumb’s $30‑Billion Bitcoin Slip‑Up: What Happened, How the Market Reacted, and What It Means for the Industry

Seoul, 7 Feb 2026 — South Korea’s largest centralized cryptocurrency exchange, Bithumb, unintentionally transferred 2,000 BTC to more than 200 accounts on Monday night. The blunder, which was supposed to be a modest 2,000 won (≈ $1.40) promotional credit, turned into a multi‑billion‑dollar airdrop that briefly destabilised the platform’s order book and triggered a regulatory probe.


The Mistake in Detail

  • Intended payout: 2,000 won per user, a token amount used in Bithumb’s “Random Box” promotion.
  • Executed payout: 2,000 BTC per user – at current market rates, each transfer was worth roughly $140 million.
  • Scope: Over 200 users received the erroneous amount, according to the exchange’s internal monitoring tools.

Bithumb confirmed the incident in a notice posted to its official feed, acknowledging that an “abnormal amount of Bitcoin” was credited to a subset of customers and that the platform immediately froze the affected accounts after detecting rapid sales activity.


Immediate Market Impact

Data from blockchain analytics firm LookOnchain showed that, within minutes of the erroneous credits, sell orders from the impacted wallets pushed the Bithumb BTC/KRW price about 18 % below the prevailing market rate. The price dip was short‑lived; once the exchange halted the transactions and the abnormal accounts were locked, liquidity normalized and the price returned to parity with other Korean exchanges.

The rapid sell‑off illustrates how even a relatively small number of large‑scale transfers can distort order‑book dynamics on a centralized venue, especially when the exchange’s internal controls are temporarily overwhelmed.


Regulatory Response

Korean financial watchdogs – the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) – have opened formal investigations. Both agencies are focusing on:

  1. Risk‑management shortcomings within Bithumb’s payout and verification processes.
  2. Potential consumer‑protection violations stemming from the inadvertent allocation of high‑value assets.
  3. Systemic implications for the Korean crypto market, which remains heavily regulated compared with many offshore jurisdictions.

The Chosun Daily, citing internal sources, reported that roughly $3 billion has already been withdrawn from Bithumb by the affected users, and that the total value of the mistakenly issued BTC could approach $30 billion if the full 2,000‑BTC figure applies to every recipient.


Analysis

1. Internal Controls vs. Scale

Bithumb’s incident underscores a classic paradox for large crypto exchanges: as user bases expand, the operational complexity of routine tasks (e.g., promotional payouts) scales non‑linearly. A simple unit error – confusing “WON” with “BTC” – magnified into a multi‑billion‑dollar exposure. The episode highlights the need for multi‑layered validation (e.g., dual‑approval workflows, automated sanity checks) before any on‑chain transaction is signed.

2. Liquidity Shock Absorption

The market dip, while dramatic, was contained to Bithumb’s order book. Korea’s crypto ecosystem is relatively deep, with several high‑volume venues (Upbit, Coinone) offering arbitrage opportunities that quickly corrected the price gap. Nevertheless, the episode serves as a reminder that centralized order books can be fragile when confronted with sudden, large‑volume outflows from a single source.

3. Regulatory Outlook

South Korean regulators have traditionally taken a proactive stance on crypto mishaps, prioritising consumer protection and systemic stability. The ongoing probe may result in:

  • Fines or remedial mandates for Bithumb to upgrade its operational risk framework.
  • Heightened reporting requirements for promotional campaigns and large‑scale transfers.
  • Industry‑wide best‑practice guidance that could ripple through other Korean exchanges.

Given the magnitude of the error, the case could become a benchmark for future regulatory standards in the region.

4. User Behaviour and Ethical Considerations

The immediate attempt by recipients to liquidate the accidental BTC raises questions about the ethical responsibilities of users who receive such assets unintentionally. While most jurisdictions lack clear statutes on “mistakenly credited crypto,” the episode may spark debates on legal obligations to return or report undue gains.


Key Takeaways

  • Human error can produce astronomical financial fallout when cryptocurrency units are conflated; robust automated safeguards are essential.
  • Centralized exchanges remain vulnerable to rapid price swings triggered by internal mishaps, even in markets with deep liquidity.
  • Regulators are likely to tighten oversight of payout mechanisms and internal controls after this incident, potentially setting new compliance baselines for the Korean market.
  • Users must be aware of legal and reputational risks associated with attempting to cash out mistakenly received assets.
  • The incident may drive industry‑wide adoption of dual‑approval signing processes, transaction‑size caps, and real‑time anomaly detection for on‑chain operations.

What’s next? Bithumb has pledged to reimburse affected users and to review its internal procedures. The FSC and FSS are expected to publish preliminary findings within the next few weeks, after which the exchange may face corrective actions or penalties. Market participants will be watching closely, as the outcome could reshape operational standards across Asia’s crypto exchanges.



Source: https://thedefiant.io/news/cefi/bithumb-mistakenly-airdrops-usd30-billion-of-bitcoin

Exit mobile version